Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2364 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 35% better in Starfield than Core i5-3450S - 62 vs 46 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $62.88 vs $280.05
- Up to 70% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-9900K - $1.52 vs $5.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
62
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.01/FPS
30.33932135728543%
Price, €
€310.86
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €310.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
46
74.19354838709677%
Value, €/FPS
€1.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
584
35.011990407673856%
Multi-Core
1681
21.118090452261306%
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Core i5-3450S |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |