Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2237 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 34% better in Rust than Core i3-3240T - 207 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $18.79 vs $296.13
- Up to 91% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-9900K - $0.14 vs $1.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €328.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5165 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
154
74%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |