Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2602 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G540 - 179 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $14.07 vs $291.75
- Up to 95% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-9900K - $0.09 vs $1.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €323.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
165
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€15.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €15.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |