Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 199 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 29% better in Rust than Celeron G4900 - 207 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $49.74 vs $299.79
- Up to 79% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-9900K - $0.34 vs $1.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 54 vs 95 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
207
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.61/FPS
21%
Price, €
€332.77
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €332.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
161
77%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |