Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2098 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 21% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron 1000M - 136 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€328.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €328.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7668 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Celeron 1000M |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 20th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket G2 (988B) |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |