Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900K is 17 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 427 vs 406 FPS
- Up to 65% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $296.13 vs $840.87
- Up to 67% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $0.77 vs $2.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 95 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900K - 48 vs 16 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
427
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€328.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €328.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5646 minutes ago
Buy for €933.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5647 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 48 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |