Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 16 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 4% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 256 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $281.51 vs $548.4
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900K - 24 vs 16 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €312.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78234 minutes ago
Buy for €608.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78234 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
76.378896882494%
Multi-Core
7454
93.64321608040201%
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |