Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 435 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 7% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 147 vs 137 FPS
- Up to 53% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $281.51 vs $599.06
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900K - 32 vs 16 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €312.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75474 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
137
93.19727891156462%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€664.96
46%
Buy for €664.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75475 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
70.20383693045564%
Multi-Core
7539
94.7110552763819%
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |