Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2564 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 34% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-8150 - 591 vs 442 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $46.81 vs $296.13
- Up to 79% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-9900K - $0.12 vs $0.56 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €328.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4219 minutes ago
Buy for €51.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |