Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 1057 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-6800K - 424 vs 406 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6800K - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $75.31 vs $264.69
- Up to 70% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-9900 - $0.21 vs $0.69 per FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €293.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
406
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€83.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €83.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |