Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900 is 2717 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 107% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-3930K - 58 vs 28 FPS
- Up to 36% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-3930K - $3.63 vs $5.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3930K - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $142.59 vs $189.81
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
58
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€210.69
75%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €210.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Buy for €158.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900 | vs | Intel Core i7-3930K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |