Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9880H outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9880H is 2750 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9880H
- Performs up to 7% better in God of War than FX-4100 - 173 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-9880H
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9880H | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i9 | Collection | FX |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
