Key Differences
In short — Core i9-8950HK outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-8950HK is 1302 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-8950HK
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-8950HK
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2018
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-8950HK | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
