Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7940X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1292 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7940X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 28 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i9-7940X - 222 vs 207 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i9-7940X - $175.48 vs $219.36
- Up to 25% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i9-7940X - $0.88 vs $1.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
FPS
207
93.24324324324324%
Value, €/FPS
€1.18/FPS
74.57627118644068%
Price, €
€243.49
79%
Buy for €243.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
222
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
100%
Price, €
€194.78
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €194.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7940X | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
28 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |