Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 2427 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 10% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-2400 - 131 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 28 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-7940X - $58.99 vs $281.51
- Up to 77% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-7940X - $0.55 vs $2.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 95 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7940X doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €312.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
119
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€65.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €65.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7940X | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
28 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |