Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 731 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 2% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-6100 - 174 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 28 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-7940X - $62.15 vs $229.59
- Up to 72% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-7940X - $0.41 vs $1.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 51 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7940X doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €254.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11770 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
170
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €68.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11769 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7940X | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
28 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |