Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-7920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 769 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - $400.11 vs $604.86
- Up to 31% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10920X - $2.39 vs $3.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 140 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-7920X - 193 vs 186 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
186
96%
Value, €/FPS
€2.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€444.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €444.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.48/FPS
68%
Price, €
€671.4
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for €671.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | Intel Core i9-10920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Skylake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |