Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-7920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1942 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $406.94 vs $658.06
- Up to 31% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i5-13400F - $1.93 vs $2.78 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 12% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i9-7920X - 263 vs 234 FPS
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
234
88%
Value, €/FPS
€1.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€451.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €451.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
263
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.78/FPS
69%
Price, €
€730.45
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for €730.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |