Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1283 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 0% better in Death Stranding than Core i9-7920X - 226 vs 225 FPS
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $60.86 vs $400.11
- Up to 85% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i9-7920X - $0.3 vs $1.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 65 vs 140 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €444.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
226
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€67.56
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €67.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |