Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 205 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 7% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G4900 - 167 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $49.74 vs $406.94
- Up to 87% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-7920X - $0.35 vs $2.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for €451.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
156
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |