Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 221 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 7 2700X - 167 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $153.55 vs $407.31
- Up to 62% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-7920X - $1.03 vs $2.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 105 vs 140 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.71/FPS
38%
Price, €
€452.11
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for €452.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19005 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
165
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€170.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19005 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Skylake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |