Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 221 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Saints Row than Ryzen 5 2600X - 161 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $127.96 vs $400.11
- Up to 68% better value when playing Saints Row than Core i9-7920X - $0.89 vs $2.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 95 vs 140 Watts
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
161
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.76/FPS
32%
Price, €
€444.12
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €444.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
159
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€142.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €142.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |