Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1783 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 8% better in DOOM Eternal than FX-8350 - 486 vs 452 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $133.09 vs $238.37
- Up to 39% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Core i9-7920X - $0.33 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 125 vs 140 Watts
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
486
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
61.11111111111111%
Price, €
€264.59
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for €264.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
452
93.00411522633745%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€147.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €147.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |