Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1783 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 12% better in Borderlands 3 than FX-8320 - 219 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $69.47 vs $238.37
- Up to 68% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Core i9-7920X - $0.39 vs $1.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 125 vs 140 Watts
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
219
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.22/FPS
31.967213114754102%
Price, €
€264.59
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €264.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
196
89.49771689497716%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.11
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €77.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |