Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1783 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 13% better in Valorant than FX-4300 - 771 vs 683 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $35.11 vs $238.37
- Up to 82% better value when playing Valorant than Core i9-7920X - $0.06 vs $0.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 95 vs 140 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
771
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
17.64705882352941%
Price, €
€264.59
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €264.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
683
88.58625162127107%
Value, €/FPS
€0.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€38.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €38.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |