Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 801 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 7% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Athlon 3000G - 106 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $38.36 vs $400.11
- Up to 90% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-7920X - $0.43 vs $4.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €444.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
99
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Athlon |
Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |