Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600XT on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1563 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600XT.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Dead Space than Ryzen 5 3600XT - 169 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $122.92 vs $318.79
- Up to 57% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-14900KF - $0.89 vs $2.09 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.09/FPS
42.58373205741627%
Price, €
€353.86
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €353.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25293 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
154
91.12426035502959%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€136.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €136.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25289 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1704
54.826254826254825%
Multi-Core
7222
34.321832525425336%
Intel Core i9-14900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |