Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3970X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3970X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4002 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3970X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 40% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3970X - 218 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3970X - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3970X
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $129.32 vs $316.68
- Up to 43% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-14900K - $0.92 vs $1.61 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
218
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.61/FPS
57%
Price, €
€351.52
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €351.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2012
FPS
156
72%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€143.54
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €143.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900K | vs | Intel Core i7-3970X |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Nov 1st, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 150 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |