Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-9700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1721 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 22% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-9700F - 164 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $204.0 vs $386.79
- Up to 35% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-14900F - $1.69 vs $2.62 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.62/FPS
64%
Price, €
€429.34
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for €429.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
134
81%
Value, €/FPS
€1.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€226.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €226.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |