Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2286 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 25% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-8400 - 216 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $68.73 vs $381.43
- Up to 78% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-14900F - $0.44 vs $1.96 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.96/FPS
22%
Price, €
€423.39
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €423.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14010 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
173
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€76.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €76.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14003 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |