Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4747 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 127% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-2500K - 593 vs 261 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $197.41 vs $381.43
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €423.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74850 minutes ago
Buy for €219.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74851 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
646
21.39072847682119%
Multi-Core
1921
10.514504652435686%
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |