Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 369 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-13500.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-13500 - 164 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13500 - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $176.41 vs $386.79
- Up to 50% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-14900F - $1.3 vs $2.62 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.62/FPS
49%
Price, €
€429.34
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for €429.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
151
92%
Value, €/FPS
€1.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€195.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €195.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i5-13500 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 14 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |