Buy on Amazon
€39.77
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4053 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 17% better in Dead Space than Celeron G1620 - 168 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
144
85.71428571428571%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.77
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 2.7 1 LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1620
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
13.543046357615893%
Multi-Core
723
3.9573070607553364%
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.