Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4094 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 16% better in Dead Space than FX-6300 - 168 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $71.68 vs $381.43
- Up to 78% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-14900F - $0.55 vs $2.52 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
168
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.52/FPS
21%
Price, €
€423.39
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €423.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8959 minutes ago
Buy for €79.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8948 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |