Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 667 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Core i9-11900F - 141 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $153.55 vs $431.4
- Up to 61% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-13900KS - $1.31 vs $3.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
141
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.4/FPS
38%
Price, €
€478.85
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for €478.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
130
92%
Value, €/FPS
€1.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€170.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |