Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2417 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 27% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-6900K - 298 vs 235 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6900K - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $87.75 vs $416.77
- Up to 74% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-13900KS - $0.41 vs $1.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 140 vs 150 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
298
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.55/FPS
26%
Price, €
€462.61
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €462.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
235
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |