Buy on Amazon
€466.68
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $699
Availability
MSRP in USD: $699
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3910 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 36% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i7-3770S - 287 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $58.13 vs $420.43
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Intel Core i9-13900KS Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P + 16 E) 36MB Cache, up to 6.0 GHz
Buy for €466.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75403 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-3770S Quad-Core Processor 3.1 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I73770S
Buy for €64.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75403 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Core i7-3770S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
669
21.545893719806763%
Multi-Core
2234
10.232217285760088%
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i7-3770S |
|---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.