Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 4098 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 49% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-2700K - 167 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $65.07 vs $431.4
- Up to 78% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-13900KS - $0.64 vs $2.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 95 vs 150 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.87/FPS
22%
Price, €
€478.85
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €478.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
112
67%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |