Buy on Amazon
€462.61
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $699
Availability
MSRP in USD: $699
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 4386 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600S.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 71% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-2600S - 785 vs 459 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600S - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $171.83 vs $416.77
- Up to 29% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-13900KS - $0.42 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
785
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
71%
Price, €
€462.61
41%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-13900KS Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P + 16 E) 36MB Cache, up to 6.0 GHz
Buy for €462.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
Core i7-2600S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
459
58%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€190.73
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-2600S Quad-Core Processor 2.8 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I72600S
Buy for €190.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Core i7-2600S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i7-2600S |
|---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.