Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7350K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2200 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 16% better in Deathloop than Core i3-7350K - 206 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $37.73 vs $416.77
- Up to 89% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-13900KS - $0.24 vs $2.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 60 vs 150 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.25/FPS
10%
Price, €
€462.61
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for €462.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
178
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €41.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
150 W | TDP | 60 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |