Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1745 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 37% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G4900 - 287 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $49.74 vs $431.4
- Up to 84% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i9-13900KS - $0.26 vs $1.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 54 vs 150 Watts
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
287
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.67/FPS
15%
Price, €
€478.85
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €478.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
210
73%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
150 W | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |