Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1960 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 48% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 785 vs 529 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 150 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
785
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€474.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €474.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10698 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |