Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2102 days newer than Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 18% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 5 1600 - 234 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
234
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.98/FPS
100%
Price, €
€462.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €462.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |