Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3502 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 37% better in Resident Evil 4 than FX-9590 - 217 vs 158 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 150 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $210.6 vs $350.96
- Up to 18% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Core i9-13900KS - $1.48 vs $1.8 per FPS
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
217
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.8/FPS
82.22222222222221%
Price, €
€389.57
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for €389.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3681 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
158
72.81105990783409%
Value, €/FPS
€1.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€233.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €233.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3672 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 220 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |