Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-8700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-8700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1730 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-8700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 40% better in Starfield than Core i7-8700 - 84 vs 60 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $117.62 vs $344.69
- Up to 52% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-13900KF - $2.18 vs $4.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
84
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.55/FPS
47.91208791208792%
Price, €
€382.61
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for €382.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54626 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
FPS
60
71.42857142857143%
Value, €/FPS
€2.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€130.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €130.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54627 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1513
50.891355533131524%
Multi-Core
5905
29.376647927963784%
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Core i7-8700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |