Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 129% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G3930 - 587 vs 256 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $46.74 vs $344.69
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €382.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76170 minutes ago
Buy for €51.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
20.450723175243862%
Multi-Core
1043
5.188796577284712%
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |