Buy on Amazon
€382.61
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $564
Availability
MSRP in USD: $564
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Ryzen 9 7845HX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 99 days older than Ryzen 9 7845HX.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Ryzen 9 7845HX - 195 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-13900KF
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.96/FPS
100%
Price, €
€382.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-13900KF Gaming Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) - Unlocked
Buy for €382.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58285 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-13900KF
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Ryzen 9 7845HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 7845HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Single-Core
2648
89.06828119744365%
Multi-Core
13771
68.50902940152231%
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Dragon Range |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
24 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.