Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Stray than FX-4300 - 190 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $35.11 vs $318.06
- Up to 88% better value when playing Stray than Core i9-13900KF - $0.22 vs $1.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
190
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.86/FPS
11.82795698924731%
Price, €
€353.05
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 255 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
176
92.63157894736842%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€38.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €38.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 255 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |