Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G640 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3768 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G640.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 53% better in World of Warcraft than Pentium G640 - 235 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G640 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $21.94 vs $336.89
- Up to 90% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i9-13900K - $0.16 vs $1.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
235
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.59/FPS
10%
Price, €
€373.95
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for €373.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
FPS
154
65%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €24.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | Intel Pentium G640 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Pentium |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |