Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3061 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 29% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-4460 - 214 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $40.22 vs $339.01
- Up to 85% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-13900K - $0.27 vs $1.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 84 vs 125 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
214
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.76/FPS
15%
Price, €
€376.3
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €376.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
166
77%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€44.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €44.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 84 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |